Dublin City University - DCU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ICD Business School Dublin vs American College Dublin - ACD vs UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
- +Welcoming and friendly student community
- +Positive and smooth overall university experience
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
- +Strong focus on student success and career development
- +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +High-quality teaching and supportive professors
- +Career development opportunities and industry preparation
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world applications.
- +Broad, interdisciplinary courses fostering transferable skills.
- +Engaging, supportive lecturers and modern facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
- -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality and value for money receive particularly high marks, suggesting a welcoming global environment and excellent return on investment. Professors also earn strong ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scores lower than other aspects, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing offerings. Other categories like facilities, location, and student life are rated positively.
Nothing to show
Examining the provided ratings, the university excels in areas like **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring well over 4.0. **Location** and **Value** also present strong points for the institution. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating a significant area for improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** fall in the mid-range, suggesting moderate satisfaction in these aspects.
With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.
Four reviews all expressed positive experiences, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include a positive learning environment, helpful professors, and a strong emphasis on developing soft skills. There were no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Around 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a practical approach, engaging lecturers, and valuable real-world skills. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I overall liked the quality of education which includes projects, assignments and levels of exams. Furthermore, teachers are really nice and always willing to help students. However, one thing I would recommend is that electives should be introduced in this course as that would really help in giving a proper direction to one's career. Secondly, internships should also be included in the module as are really helpful in getting a job.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
