Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs KCA University vs Kenya Methodist University - KeMU vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Laikipia University

Side-by-side comparison from 267 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT: wins 0/7 categories
KCA University: wins 1/7 categories
Kenya Methodist University - KeMU: wins 5/7 categories
The Catholic University of Eastern Africa: wins 0/7 categories
Laikipia University: wins 0/7 categories
Management University of Africa: wins 1/7 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
71 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Development Studies
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.32
4.40
Win
3.95
3.20
4.00
3.75
Location
4.46
4.46
4.75
4.71
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.32
4.49
4.53
Win
4.14
4.20
4.33
4.00
Internationality
3.95
4.25
Win
4.24
4.19
2.80
3.67
3.00
Student life
4.27
4.44
4.56
Win
4.05
3.40
3.33
2.75
Value
4.35
4.61
4.76
Win
4.48
4.00
4.33
4.25
Accommodation
3.68
3.65
4.40
Win
3.67
2.75
3.33
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong STEM, agriculture, and technology programmes
  • +Supportive academic environment and practical learning
  • +Positive student experience and sense of community
  • +Practical and well-structured programs with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Quality education and career-oriented focus
  • +Positive campus environment for collaboration and personal development
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Welcoming community and engaging learning environment
  • +Good facilities and accessible location
  • +Supportive learning environment and approachable faculty
  • +High academic quality and relevant course material
  • +Beautiful campus and Christian-based values
  • +Practical learning and quality education in key programs
  • +Conducive, serene, and quiet learning environment
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff
  • +Engaging faculty and supportive staff
  • +Opportunities for strong student-staff and peer interaction
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
Cons
  • -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
  • -Repetitive or theoretical coursework.
  • -Issues with program management and limited career prospects.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are not engaging or relevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective teaching and outdated curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners notable strengths in its **Location**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Internationality is rated moderately well. Overall, the university presents a strong academic and environmental offering, with room for improvement in housing.

This university excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for Value (4.61), Professors (4.49), and Location (4.46). Student Life and Internationality also received strong scores, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower rating of 3.65.

This institution garners strong feedback across its offerings, with an exceptional score for Location and Value. Professors also received high marks. Conversely, Internationality is its relatively weakest area, though still rated well. Facilities, Student Life, and Accomodation all achieved solid, consistent scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

Evaluations reveal a strong showing for this institution, particularly in location, which received the highest score. Internationality and value also scored highly, indicating positive perceptions in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presented the weakest rating among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and student life received solid scores, falling comfortably within the upper range of the assessments. Professors were also rated favorably, reflecting a competent academic staff.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and overall value, with particularly high ratings for Professors (4.2) and Value (4). Conversely, the university faces challenges in its Accommodation (2.75) and Internationality (2.8) scores, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance the student experience. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately.

This institution receives high marks for its outstanding location, earning a perfect score. Professors and overall value are also strong points, both rated at 4.33. Facilities are well-regarded at 4. Student life and accommodation, however, are areas for potential improvement, scoring 3.33. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.67.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.38/5 based on 146 reviews, ~92% of students highlight strong academic programs and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~2%) mentioned occasional administrative or faculty support challenges.

With ~93% positive reviews, students praise the university for its rewarding academic programs, well-structured curriculum, and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Practical learning and a collaborative campus environment are frequently highlighted.

Students highly praise the university, citing knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, a strong sense of community, and supportive facilities as key strengths. The academic environment is described as rigorous yet welcoming.

With a ~81% positive sentiment, students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Minimal negative feedback (~4.8%) noted issues with communication and infrastructure.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the quality education, practical learning, and dedicated faculty, especially in Agriculture, Education, and Business Studies. The serene learning environment and well-equipped facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic learning environment and supportive faculty interactions. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Rating distribution
5★
52%
63%
47%
52%
60%
33%
25%
4★
36%
27%
53%
29%
20%
33%
50%
3★
10%
10%
0%
14%
20%
33%
25%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Hands-On and Practical Learning

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.

My university

I joined this university, not because it offers a high education but because of its conducive environment and supportive lecturers and professors. You can find people with different cultural backgrounds, which makes the university inclusive. One problem that the university shares with most universities in Nairobi, is the lack of ergonomic chairs in ICT rooms and the library.

Nothing to show

Worst University Ever !!

As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.

Nothing to show

University and Friendships

The college experience for me was the greatest platform to create friendships with not only fellow student but with professors too. The university staff was intentional in interacting with students, in class and outside class. The university organized events that made these interactions possible and easy. This was one of the best things in my campus life

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close