Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 5/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
0%
0%
100%
100%
33%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close