University of Duisburg-Essen - UDE vs National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU vs Eastern Virginia Medical School - EVMS vs Zarqa University vs National School of Business and Management in Settat
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality research and practical application focus
- +Supportive environment with approachable professors and diverse culture
- +Strong applied learning and research opportunities
- +Supportive environment for language and cultural immersion
- +Accessible international programs taught in English
- +Democratic atmosphere for cultural exploration
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging instructors and inspiring teaching
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues, including misinformation and perceived academic corruption.
- -Inadequate curriculum and teaching quality, leaving graduates unprepared for the job market.
- -Concerns about discrimination and an unpleasant student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lack of student support and resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Poor English proficiency of some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of student support and care is a significant concern.
Overall, this university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting strong academic guidance. Conversely, student life and accommodation emerge as areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience. Other evaluated categories, including facilities, location, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate to good range.
Overall, this university received consistently low ratings across all surveyed aspects, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Scores of zero were recorded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This suggests significant room for improvement in every facet of the university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its accommodation facilities, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities, location, and value for money, all scoring a low 1. Professors, student life, and internationality received moderate ratings of 2, indicating these aspects are neither a strong suit nor a major weakness.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, practical learning, and a global, well-resourced environment. A small portion of feedback (~10%) notes issues with information transparency and curriculum relevance.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights a great environment for learning Chinese, including native speakers and cultural exploration. Programs taught in English are also a positive aspect for international students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has received one review, which is negative. The student rated it 1 out of 5 stars, citing unprofessionalism, poor program management, and English language difficulties among some professors.
I spend most of my time studying in the Library and I really did not appreciate the fact that there air conditioning system in Library is not working. We all the heat I wish the air conditioning system problem should be solved. I encountered the same problem in ST Gebäude Today during my Maths class. I could not concentrate during the lessons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
