University of Eldoret vs Taraba State polytechnic Suntai Jalingo Campus - Tsp vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs Taraba State University - TSU vs NUC University

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eldoret (4.80)
University of Eldoret: wins 3/7 categories
Taraba State polytechnic Suntai Jalingo Campus - Tsp: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 1/7 categories
Taraba State University - TSU: wins 1/7 categories
NUC University: wins 2/7 categories
Federal University Wukari - FUW: wins 0/7 categories
Levy Mwanawasa Medical University - LMMU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: BA Political Science
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
1.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.41
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.83
1.00
3.89
Not rated
Location
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.75
1.00
3.63
Not rated
Professors
4.39
Not rated
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
4.28
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.50
Win
3.78
Not rated
Student life
4.53
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.60
2.00
3.78
Not rated
Value
4.67
Not rated
4.00
4.83
Win
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.31
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
1.00
3.89
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers & practical, rewarding courses
  • +Modern facilities & equipment
  • +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and facilities
  • +Academic knowledge and practical skill development
  • +Engaging teaching & inspiring instructors
  • +Relevant curriculum & practical application
  • +Supportive learning environment & community
  • +Strong academic standards and supportive lecturers
  • +Emphasis on character development and discipline
  • +Positive campus environment and facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication plague students.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication gaps and lack of support create frustration.
  • -Poor administrative and support services.
  • -Unresolved financial and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of communication and accessible help.
  • -Administrative and management issues impact staff benefits and compensation.
  • -Issues related to employment conditions and benefits are a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4. The **Internationality** score, at 3, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, along with **Location** and **Accomodation**, which both sit at 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths and some areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing across multiple aspects. Its **value** stands out with an exceptional rating, alongside high marks for **professors** and **accommodation**. On the other hand, **student life** and **internationality** received the lowest scores, though still respectable. Facilities and location also fall within a solid mid-range performance.

Academic strengths shine through with a perfect score for professors, and a strong showing in internationality. However, significant weaknesses are evident in facilities, location, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving the lowest possible rating. Student life also falls short of expectations.

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with professors and value being standout areas. Facilities and accommodation also received positive feedback, alongside student life and internationality. The lowest-rated aspect, though still respectable, is location. The university demonstrates a solid, albeit not perfect, all-around performance.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted life-changing experiences, academically rewarding courses combining theory and practice, and supportive lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted regarding administrative delays.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise the conducive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and valuable academic/practical experiences. A small amount of feedback (~17%) suggests a need for improved equipment and more qualified teachers.

Both reviews are negative, highlighting terrible and unresponsive student support. Students reported issues with funding assistance and difficulty resolving inquiries, with ~100% of feedback being negative.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from nine reviews, ~89% are positive, highlighting excellent lecturers, character development, and a sense of belonging. One ~11% review mentioned staff issues with pensions and salaries.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
78%
0%
50%
33%
0%
56%
0%
4★
22%
0%
50%
50%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
11%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good learning environment

The learning environment is conducive. good accommodation for students especially the female hostels, almost 24/7 electricity. secure environment. When it comes to academic performance I'd say they are average, The lecturers are sometimes not motivated to teach because of delay in their salaries but overall the university is good but could be better with better government,

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close