University of Carthage - UCAR vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs University of Miami vs Nasarawa State University Keffi - NSUK vs CMU College of Makeup Art & Design - cmu

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Miami (4.50)
University of Carthage - UCAR: wins 0/7 categories
IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School: wins 0/7 categories
University of Miami: wins 7/7 categories
Nasarawa State University Keffi - NSUK: wins 0/7 categories
CMU College of Makeup Art & Design - cmu: wins 0/7 categories
Davenport University: wins 0/7 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Bogor: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Data Science
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Statistics
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
1.50
4.00
4.61
Win
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
3.00
4.57
Win
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
3.00
4.65
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
4.00
4.57
Win
3.48
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.00
4.61
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.00
4.00
4.57
Win
3.66
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
3.00
4.48
Win
3.44
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Practical, real-world focused curriculum
  • +Strong French language support
  • +Rigorous academic programs
  • +Supportive professors and staff
  • +Engaging curriculum with real-world application
  • +Positive and inclusive campus atmosphere
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Effective and impactful teaching

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Uncooperative staff
  • -Discouraging reliance on the institution
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Poor advising and career services support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear expectations are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance based on student feedback. The **strongest areas** are Location (4) and Professors (3.5), suggesting a positive experience with campus surroundings and academic staff. Conversely, Accomodation (1) and Facilities (1.5) are identified as the **weakest points**, indicating significant room for improvement in these crucial aspects of campus living. Student Life and Internationality received moderate scores, while Value sits at a lower end.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.

This university garners strong scores across the board, with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated very favorably, closely followed by location, internationality, and value. Accommodation stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still receiving a solid rating.

This institution receives its highest marks for its professors, followed closely by its location and student life. Areas that scored lower include accommodation and internationality, with facilities also receiving a moderate rating. The value for money is also rated moderately, falling between the strongest and weakest categories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 2.5/5 from two reviews, 50% of feedback was negative. Students cited unorganized administration and uncooperative staff as concerns.

With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.

All 23 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.48/5. Students praise academic brilliance, real-world application, nurturing environments, and helpful faculty. They highlight engaging professors, research opportunities, and a positive social atmosphere.

Students praise academic support, knowledgeable and approachable faculty, and the serene campus environment for learning. The curriculum effectively enhances critical thinking and analytical skills. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
48%
45%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
100%
52%
48%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A challenging but worthwhile experience

IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.

Nothing to show

Discovering excellence at NSUK

Nasarawa State University is a reputable institution that offers a serene and conducive environment for learning, fostering a sense of community among its students. The university's faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing quality education in various fields, including Community Health Science, where students can gain valuable insights and skills to excel in their chosen profession. What truly stood out was the engaging classes, where theoretical concepts were seamlessly integrated with practical applications, allowing students to grasp complex ideas with ease. The university's commitment to academic excellence is evident in every aspect, making it an excellent choice for prospective students seeking a well-rounded education. I wholeheartedly recommend Nasarawa State University to anyone looking to pursue a degree in Community Health Science or any other field.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close