Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Metropolitan University Sylhet vs Sylhet Medical University vs Leading University - LUS
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and research, particularly in STEM fields.
- +Vibrant campus community with diverse opportunities for personal and professional development.
- +Strong reputation and positive impact on graduates' careers.
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Outstanding quality of classes and lectures
- +Helpful courses for long-term goals
- +Supportive teachers and focus-conducive facilities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive staff and excellent instruction
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse clubs
- +Quality academic programs and facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical and professional readiness focus with real-world application.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty bridging theory and trends.
- +Good learning environment with valuable skills and opportunities for development.
- -Administrative and management issues persist.
- -Lack of expert professors and modern courses is a concern.
- -Insufficient classroom and lab facilities are problematic.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often seen as insufficient or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in key student experience areas. Location and student life received the highest marks, both scoring 4.625. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.375. Conversely, accommodations and internationality are the lowest-rated aspects, each at 3.75. Facilities and value fall in the middle, with scores of 4.0625 and 4.25 respectively.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably in student life, location, and professor quality, all rated 4.75. Internationality and value also received strong marks. The weakest area for the university is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Facilities are rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
This institution garners praise for its excellent Professors and desirable Location, both receiving a high 4.8 rating. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, scoring 4.6. While Internationality is rated a respectable 4.2, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.8. Overall, the university offers strong value, reflected in its 4.6 rating.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4, this institution excels in several key areas. Notably, **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value** all received a near-perfect score of 4.75. The university also scored well in **Facilities** (4.5) and **Student Life** and **Internationality** (both 4.25). The **Accomodation** received the lowest, yet still positive, rating of 4.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~94%) citing a friendly environment, development opportunities, and quality education. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) mentions department-specific issues like limited facilities and less modern courses.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, approximately 75% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight outstanding classes and programs that align with career goals. A small amount of feedback noted slightly longer class times.
Nothing to show
Students praise the welcoming environment, beautiful campus, and excellent instruction. Amenities, clubs, and supportive staff are frequently highlighted. Educational opportunities and programs are also well-regarded. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise supportive professors, useful courses, and a good learning environment. Practical training and professional readiness are highlighted, alongside enriching activities and research opportunities.
Sylhet's Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) is a well-known university that has made significant growth. Various academic and extracurricular activities have elevated this university to national and worldwide prominence. Teachers and students participate in a variety of programs to help the institution become a centre of excellence. I got every opportunity to learn a lot as a computer science student.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university itself is a little outdated technology wise, but stands out in the material being taught and the methods utilized to do so, the professors are very informative and knowledgeable while maintaining professionalism. Its a vast university in terms of size and lecture halls and also grants you a great diploma at the end of the road.
