Liverpool Hope University - Hope vs National University of Food Technologies - NUFT vs Igbinedion University - IUO vs Walailak University International College of Dentistry vs Ambrose Alli University - AAUE

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The Catholic University of Malawi (5.00)
Liverpool Hope University - Hope: wins 0/6 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/6 categories
Igbinedion University - IUO: wins 0/6 categories
Walailak University International College of Dentistry: wins 0/6 categories
Ambrose Alli University - AAUE: wins 0/6 categories
The Catholic University of Malawi: wins 6/6 categories
IFTM University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Liverpool, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Social Work
moradabad, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
Not rated
3.82
Not rated
3.12
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
3.73
Not rated
3.64
Not rated
2.94
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.98
Not rated
4.18
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.89
Not rated
3.91
Not rated
3.39
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.30
Not rated
3.86
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.74
Not rated
4.18
Not rated
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.85
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.37
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and interactive tutors and teaching staff
  • +Welcoming and inclusive student experience
  • +Good course variety and clear curriculum delivery

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Supportive campus environment and student well-being
  • +Focus on student development and value for money

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and intelligent lecturers
  • +Disciplined and knowledge-focused environment
  • +Amazing campus life and student support
  • +Engaging and flexible learning experiences
  • +Supportive campus life and lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor quality of lecturing and lack of feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor service delivery, including bribery.
  • -Insufficient funding for departments and lack of essential learning tools.
  • -Expensive transportation and numerous charges for school needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and research.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs best in its **Facilities**, earning a solid 4.06 rating. **Student Life** also scores well at a 4.0. The university's lowest-scoring area is **Location**, with a rating of 3.73. Other categories such as Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within a mid-range of 3.85 to 3.98, indicating generally positive but not exceptional feedback in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Student life stands out as the university's strongest aspect, receiving a high rating of 4.3. Professors and value also scored very well, both at 4.18. Accommodation follows closely with a rating of 4. The weakest area, based on these scores, is the university's location, rated at 3.64. Facilities and internationality also received solid, though not exceptional, marks.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a varied picture based on its ratings. Student life emerges as the strongest area, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, location received the lowest score, suggesting potential drawbacks in accessibility or surroundings. Other categories like professors, value, and internationality all received solid mid-range scores, painting a generally positive but not exceptional portrait of the university.

This institution boasts exceptional scores, achieving a perfect five out of five in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Accommodations, while still strong, represent its sole area for potential improvement with a rating of four. The overall value is also rated highly, suggesting a positive return on investment for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 92% of 12 reviews are positive, citing great support, interactive teaching, and a comfortable atmosphere. A small amount of negative feedback (~8%) mentioned issues with lecturing quality.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students praise amazing lecturers, a focus on total development, and a positive campus life. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

About ~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, a disciplined environment, and valuable experiences. Negative feedback (~8.3%) mentions issues with infrastructure and administrative processes.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive, highlighting an entertaining and flexible program with engaging campus life and excellent lecturers. This single review indicates a highly satisfactory student experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
42%
0%
55%
0%
28%
100%
0%
4★
50%
0%
18%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
27%
0%
31%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not Very Satisfactory

This university has a long way to go in terms of numbers and quality care for their students and also in terms of preparing students for the outside world and I won't recommend it for anyone who wants quality education beyond the norm we experience here. In campus life what stood out for me was my final year project because I had the opportunity of doing a real-life project instead of using animals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close