Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Sapienza – Università di Roma vs University of Alabama in Huntsville - UAH vs Peking University - PKU vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU
Side-by-side comparison from 148 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
- +Well-structured programs with relevant, real-world applications
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors fostering interactive learning
- +International environment and ample opportunities for growth
- +Supportive and friendly professors and students
- +Beautiful campus with diverse community and active international students
- +Excellent academic programs preparing for career success
- +Strong academic programs in medicine and engineering
- +Global outlook and international student community
- +Development of leadership qualities
Nothing to show
- +Practical application and skill development
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Positive student life and atmosphere
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause students to feel like a number.
- -Outdated facilities and labs limit the quality of education and practical experience.
- -Lack of preparation for the job market and unhelpful teaching staff are recurring concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and not relevant to current industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inflexible course structures and limited support are problematic.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
Considering the provided ratings, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Location** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive a strong rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, falling between the strongest and weakest aspects.
With a solid overall score of 4, this institution shines in several key areas. Professors and accommodation received particularly strong marks, indicating excellent teaching quality and living arrangements. Student life also garnered a high rating, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. The weakest, though still commendable, area appears to be facilities, which, while rated at a respectable 4, could benefit from some enhancement.
The university garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect ratings for its professors, location, and accommodation. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4 out of 5. Internationality also stands out with a perfect score. The university's value proposition is rated at 4, indicating a strong overall offering with particularly impressive strengths in faculty, campus environment, and living arrangements.
Nothing to show
This institution receives commendable evaluations across most aspects, with its **Location** standing out as a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are all highly rated at 4.5. **Professors** and **Internationality** also score well with 4 out of 5. The weakest area, though still strong, is **Professors** and **Internationality**.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-structured programs, knowledgeable professors, and international opportunities. Negative feedback, representing ~4.8%, mentions disorganization and unengaging teaching.
All 11 reviews are positive, with students expressing high satisfaction (~100%). Recurring themes include academic excellence, a beautiful campus, and helpful, friendly professors. No negative feedback was provided.
Reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~67% positive). Students praise its leadership development, international focus, and strong programs, especially in medicine and engineering. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Key highlights include valuable practical and theoretical programs, professional and supportive lecturers, and a positive student atmosphere.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
I studied at the Sapienza University of Rome. I think it is one of the best Italian universities, among its strong points we have: prestigious professors and a super active student community. the negative point is that there are many students and sometimes they are difficult to follow everyone. Beyond this I recommend the university. I studied in the economics faculty and I must say that it is really well organised. there are numerous study rooms, laboratories and there is a canteen which allows students to eat good food for a few euros. Sapienza is today a point of reference in the Italian community for capable young graduates!
Nothing to show
This is one of the best university to study medicine and engineering. Students are encouraged and smooth system of education makes it "the best". This university offers many courses and students from all over the world gets admission here.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
