London School of Commerce - LSC vs Mount Carmel College - MCC vs Ramaiah College of Law vs ISBR Business School vs Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ramaiah College of Law (4.70)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/6 categories
Mount Carmel College - MCC: wins 0/6 categories
Ramaiah College of Law: wins 4/6 categories
ISBR Business School: wins 1/6 categories
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: wins 0/6 categories
Garden City University - GCU: wins 0/6 categories
St Joseph’s University - SJU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Sociology
Bangalore, India
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Legislative Law
Bangalore, India
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Master in Management
Best programme: Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
3.44
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
4.67
4.67
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
3.89
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.89
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.22
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
3.89
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.89
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty and staff
  • +Diverse subject combinations and exploration opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus life and strong student community
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Excellent professional development opportunities
  • +Broadening of opportunities and challenging activities
  • +strong academics and professors
  • +engaging extracurriculars for portfolio building
  • +memorable campus life

Nothing to show

  • +Inclusive and considerate learning environment
  • +Balanced academic and extracurricular focus

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are inconsistent, with many finding it irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Disappointing facilities and learning resources are a common complaint.
  • -Issues with administrative processes and communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Inflexible policies and a lack of responsiveness from staff are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest score, and a notably positive reception for **Student Life**. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring lower than other surveyed aspects. Other categories like Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all garnered strong, consistent ratings.

A generally positive university profile is evident, with professors receiving the highest possible rating of 5. Location and accommodation also score strongly. Areas with slightly lower, though still good, scores include internationality. Facilities, student life, and value are all rated consistently well, indicating a solid all-around experience.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its vibrant **Student Life** standing out as its strongest asset. **Professors** and **Location** also receive excellent marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which, while solid, are rated slightly lower than other aspects. The university demonstrates a good international presence and offers good value.

Nothing to show

With impressive scores in internationality and value, this institution excels in attracting global students and offering a worthwhile experience. However, the university's weakest areas lie in its location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving zero ratings. Facilities and professors are rated moderately at three stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise academic excellence, friendly faculty, and a beautiful campus. Some note minor drawbacks like lack of lifts.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the supportive environment, helpful faculty, and exceptional opportunities for professional and personal development.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, the 2 reviews highlight strong academics and cherished campus life. Placements are a noted challenge. Negative feedback is minimal.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the university's diversity, thoughtfulness in considering students, and the balance between academics and extracurriculars.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
33%
33%
50%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close