University of Porto - U.Porto vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs Kabarak University - KABU vs Kutaisi International University - KIU vs African Institute of Research and Development Studies - AIRADS College

Side-by-side comparison from 90 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kabarak University - KABU (4.70)
University of Porto - U.Porto: wins 1/7 categories
Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK: wins 1/7 categories
Kabarak University - KABU: wins 3/7 categories
Kutaisi International University - KIU: wins 0/7 categories
African Institute of Research and Development Studies - AIRADS College : wins 0/7 categories
Nam Dinh University of Nursing: wins 0/7 categories
IUT of Aix-Marseille site Arles: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Adult Nursing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
3.50
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.27
4.33
4.48
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
3.89
4.17
4.68
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.95
4.33
Win
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.29
Win
4.17
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.06
3.67
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.61
4.00
4.42
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and quality education
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and internship opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and a vibrant student environment
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
  • +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
  • +Holistic academic and spiritual development
  • +Dedicated and approachable faculty
  • +Positive and disciplined learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, skill-focused curriculum with theory-project balance
  • +Approachable teachers and personalized learning environment
  • +Smaller class sizes and solid academic offering
Cons
  • -Lack of student engagement and interactive learning.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived exploitation of international students.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Inconsistent grading and unclear expectations cause frustration.
  • -Communication from instructors and administration is often poor.
  • -Facilities are frequently in disrepair and lack modern resources.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives favorable ratings across multiple aspects. Student life and location stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.2. Facilities and value also performed well, with ratings over 4.0. Accommodation, however, emerged as the weakest area, receiving the lowest score. Internationality and professors' ratings fall in the middle range, indicating solid but less exceptional performance.

The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.

The university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a perfect score of 4.75. **Professors** also garnered high marks, rating at 4.68. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score at 4.21. Overall, the institution maintains a positive standing in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring above 4.20.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels with perfect scores for its facilities and professors, indicating a highly supportive learning environment. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings, suggesting areas for potential development. Accommodation is well-regarded, and the overall value proposition is strong.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.02 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic reputation, research, and a stimulating environment. A small ~2% of feedback mentions issues with limited debate and class structure.

Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.

With ~96% positive feedback, reviewers highlight academic excellence, holistic development including spiritual growth, and dedicated faculty. The serene environment and quality education are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. Students appreciate practical courses, approachable teachers, and a mix of theory and project work. Smaller class sizes contribute to a positive learning environment.

Rating distribution
5★
24%
29%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
56%
14%
21%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
19%
57%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close