Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETH Zurich vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy vs St. Norbert College vs Fairfield University vs Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kabarak University - KABU (4.70)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETH Zurich: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: wins 2/7 categories
St. Norbert College: wins 0/7 categories
Fairfield University: wins 0/7 categories
Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ: wins 0/7 categories
Kabarak University - KABU: wins 4/7 categories
Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University - CRSU : wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Economics
De Pere, Wisconsin, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Nutrition and Dietetics
Best programme: Adult Nursing
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
4.43
Win
4.00
Location
4.25
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.48
5.00
Win
Professors
3.78
3.70
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.68
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.13
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
4.21
Win
1.00
Student life
4.10
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.22
3.50
Value
4.45
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
4.75
4.00
Accommodation
3.19
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.42
Win
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional academic rigor and depth of theory
  • +Supportive faculty and collaborative learning environment
  • +Vibrant student life and diverse opportunities
  • +High academic standards and international focus
  • +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
  • +Strong reputation and European standards

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and excellent teachers
  • +Well-equipped facilities and organized programs
  • +Strong reputation and career prospects
  • +Holistic academic and spiritual development
  • +Dedicated and approachable faculty
  • +Positive and disciplined learning environment
  • +Focus on academics and a structured learning environment.
  • +Availability of extracurricular activities like NCC and NSS.
  • +Multiple college branches within the university network.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Instruction quality and student support are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including perceived dishonesty and unhelpfulness.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of resources and support systems is frustrating.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a strong showing in several areas, notably its **Value** at 4.45 and **Location** at 4.25. **Facilities** also receive a commendable rating of 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.19. **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.78, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** fall within a solid range above 4.0.

This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university presents a mixed profile, with its strongest rating in **Location** at 4. Areas of good performance include **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring 3.67. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating at 3.0. Facilities, Internationality, and Value all fall in the mid-range with scores around 3.33.

The university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a perfect score of 4.75. **Professors** also garnered high marks, rating at 4.68. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score at 4.21. Overall, the institution maintains a positive standing in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring above 4.20.

This institution excels in several key areas, with location receiving the highest mark of 5. Facilities and professors are also strong points, both earning a 4. However, student life and accommodation present areas for improvement, scoring 3.5 and 2.5 respectively. Notably, internationality received the lowest rating at 1, indicating a significant need for enhancement in that aspect. The overall value is rated a respectable 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97%), with students praising the demanding but supportive study environment, innovative research, and good infrastructure. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University reviews are mostly positive, with 2 out of 3 (about 67%) giving high ratings. Students praised the high level of education and well-equipped facilities. One review (about 33%) expressed dissatisfaction, citing concerns about the university's focus on money over students and inconsistent support.

With ~96% positive feedback, reviewers highlight academic excellence, holistic development including spiritual growth, and dedicated faculty. The serene environment and quality education are frequently praised.

Both reviews are positive, indicating a 100% satisfaction rate. Students appreciate the availability of NCC, NSS, and placement opportunities. The general environment is described as conducive to studying.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
50%
0%
0%
33%
75%
0%
4★
50%
50%
0%
0%
33%
21%
100%
3★
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Geting a very deep understanding of the material.

Pro: Very good education. Con: Very high workload. We get tought more details and theory behind the concepts we learn than at other universities. However, this also shows in a higher workload. Nevertheless, it is very interesting. For student life, there are lots of great student associations, there is really something for everyone and plenty of events to attend or associations to join.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Medical Laboratory School is recommended

I spent 3 years at USJ in the faculty of pharmacy, school of medical analysis laboratory technicians (ETLAM). The school was well organized, the lessons very clear with excellent teachers and access to the university's laboratories, which were also well equipped. I recommend those who wish to work as clinical laboratory technicians to continue their studies at USJ. The lessons are given in French, but we also had English lessons to improve our skills in this language. Student life at USJ is friendly, that said, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the timetable is decided beforehand, the student cannot choose his own schedule as in other universities in Lebanon.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close