Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ (4.70)
Universidad del valle de México - UVM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Humanities
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.50
4.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.06
Location
4.31
4.50
4.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.18
Professors
4.47
4.41
4.50
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.52
Win
Internationality
3.60
4.59
Win
2.50
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.73
Student life
4.43
4.63
3.50
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.12
Value
3.87
4.63
Win
4.50
3.67
Not rated
3.00
4.15
Accommodation
3.50
4.66
Win
1.00
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible education via scholarships
  • +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
  • +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
  • +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
  • +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Strong theoretical and practical preparation in technology, engineering, and architecture
  • +Supportive professors and excellent academic/extracurricular opportunities
  • +Well-equipped facilities and relevant programs for workforce readiness
Cons
  • -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
  • -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum needs modernization to be relevant.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors received the highest rating at approximately 4.52, followed closely by Location (4.18) and Value (4.15). Student Life and Facilities also scored well, above 4.0. The weakest areas identified were Accomodation, with a rating of 3.66, and Internationality at 3.73.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

University reviews indicate a strong positive sentiment, with ~74% praising practical learning and professor support. A small minority (~3.9%) raised concerns.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
67%
67%
67%
0%
50%
58%
4★
25%
39%
33%
0%
0%
0%
31%
3★
38%
3%
0%
33%
0%
0%
8%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Acquire the knowledge you need at your pace

The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close