LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Jakarta State Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jayabaya University (5.00)
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/6 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/6 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 1/6 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/6 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 3/6 categories
Universitas Mercu Buana: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.28
4.17
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
4.59
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.75
4.17
4.50
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
4.17
4.00
Not rated
2.50
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.17
4.17
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.39
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.13
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
56%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
39%
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close