LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Pancasila University vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI
Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
- +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
- +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
- +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
- +Improved campus facilities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
Nothing to show
- -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
Nothing to show
With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.
Nothing to show
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show