Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Gunadarma University vs Esa Unggul University - UEU

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jakarta State University (4.70)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/6 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 1/6 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/6 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/6 categories
Esa Unggul University - UEU: wins 3/6 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 2/6 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.25
4.22
4.17
4.50
Win
4.33
4.00
Location
4.15
4.75
4.37
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.64
4.75
4.50
4.50
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.71
4.75
Win
4.33
4.00
4.50
4.67
4.00
Student life
4.21
4.00
4.42
4.17
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
Value
4.57
4.50
4.42
4.50
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
Accommodation
4.38
4.00
4.14
4.17
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Accessible location and engaging classroom environment
  • +Supportive and guiding lecturers
  • +Opportunities for critical thinking and discussion
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths across multiple facets. Its location and student life receive perfect scores, while facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Value also stands out with a perfect score. While all areas are strong, the university truly excels in providing an exceptional student experience and an advantageous location.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the strategic location and accessible campus. They also highlight caring lecturers who provide guidance and encourage critical thinking.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
50%
64%
50%
50%
67%
0%
4★
36%
50%
31%
50%
50%
33%
100%
3★
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Best private universities in Jakarta

The esa unggul campus is one of the best private universities in the city of Jakarta with a strategic location, easily accessible by various modes of public transportation. With an attractive classroom atmosphere and professional classroom teachers, it creates an informative class.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close