Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/5 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 2/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Nothing to show

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
100%
0%
33%
0%
100%
4★
60%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close