Universidad Nacional del Litoral - UNL vs University of Montenegro vs University of Constantine 1 vs Université Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2 vs Sadhu Vaswani International School

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Constantine 1 (5.00)
Universidad Nacional del Litoral - UNL: wins 1/7 categories
University of Montenegro: wins 0/7 categories
University of Constantine 1: wins 6/7 categories
Université Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2: wins 0/7 categories
Sadhu Vaswani International School: wins 0/7 categories
Princess Sumaya University for Technology - PSUT: wins 0/7 categories
St Louis Adult Learning Center: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Podgorica, Montenegro
3.60
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Constantine, Algeria
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
2.63
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Student life
4.25
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.75
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.25
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Academic excellence and quality education
  • +Strong emphasis on research and innovation
  • +Good facilities and university reputation
  • +Engaging professors with real-world experience.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum offering theoretical and practical knowledge.
  • +Authentic cultural and historical learning experiences.
  • +Free education, transportation, and food.
  • +Relaxing forest campus location.
  • +Interesting classes and great professors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Individual student focus and small class sizes
  • +High-quality faculty and instruction

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and poor communication are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication is frequently unclear and unhelpful.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exhibiting a robust overall performance, this institution particularly shines in its **internationality** and **value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Professors** also earned a commendable 4.5. The university's **facilities** represent its weakest area, scoring a 4. While other aspects like location, student life, and accommodation are rated favorably, these remain slightly below the top-tier scores.

This university is highly rated for its **location** (4.29) and **professors** (4.13), reflecting a positive academic and environmental experience. **Value** also scores well at 4.0. However, **internationality** is a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating of 2.63. Other aspects like **student life** and **accommodations** are moderately rated at 3.75, with **facilities** at 3.25.

With outstanding scores in key areas, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect 5. The weakest point lies in its internationality, which scored a moderate 3. Despite this, the overall value is rated a perfect 5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution's strengths lie in its faculty and the value it offers, both receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, its weakest area is accommodation, which scored a low 1. Other aspects, including facilities, location, student life, and internationality, fall in the middle range, suggesting room for improvement in these departments.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise its academic quality, strong reputation, and emphasis on research and innovation. No negative reviews were provided.

With 4 out of 8 reviews being positive (4-5 stars), students express happiness with their degree experience and comprehensive curricula. They also appreciate engaging professors and departments located in historically rich areas. Some wish for updated course content and more practical experience.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), awarding a perfect 5/5. Students praise the university's location, interesting classes, and excellent professors. They also highlight free transportation, food, and education as significant benefits.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, with a 4/5 average rating. The reviewer highlighted the university's focus on individual students and small class sizes, noting professors are aware of more students.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
13%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
38%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
25%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close