Vilnius University vs Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK vs BMI Executive Institute vs Kazimieras Simonavicius University
Side-by-side comparison from 208 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
- +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Opportunities for success and career preparation
- +Practical, career-oriented education with real-world skills
- +Supportive, approachable lecturers with professional experience
- +Friendly learning environment with personal and professional growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Expert and recognized faculty
- +Relevant and modern curriculum
- +Practical business applications
- +Excellent professors and quality teaching in accessible languages
- +Diverse and interdisciplinary academic programs
- +Vibrant campus life and good value for money
- +Supportive faculty and practical, relevant curriculum
- +Smooth, organized admissions and international student support
- +Modern, English-taught programs focused on practical skills
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Outdated facilities and a small, unappealing campus environment.
- -Limited course offerings in English and a perceived lack of appeal for students.
- -Struggles with administrative and management issues.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent complaints.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks for its location, student life, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.2. A notable area for improvement is accommodation, which received the lowest rating at 3.18. The overall value proposition is solid, rated at 4.03.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.
Exceptional scores highlight the university's strengths. Facilities receive a perfect 5, with professors, location, and student life also earning high marks at 4.75. Internationality and value are well-regarded at 4.25. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weaker area, scoring a 4. While generally strong, this indicates room for improvement in student housing options.
This institution receives high marks for its academic offerings, with Professors earning a strong 4.33. Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring a 4. However, areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, both receiving a 3.5 rating. Student Life presents a mixed picture, rated at 3.67, while Location and Internationality fall in the mid-range with 3.83.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.37/5, ~97% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical, career-oriented programs, supportive lecturers, and a modern learning environment. A single negative review exists.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.
Four out of four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a high-quality, diverse academic experience with professional, engaging professors. The university is recommended for its academic freedom, critical thinking emphasis, and value.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a good learning environment, quality of education with practical studies, and helpful international admission support.
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
