Universidad del Atlántico - UA vs Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti - FPA vs Porto School of Economics and Management vs Ekiti State University - EKSU vs Afe Babalola University - ABUAD

Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IAEC University - IAEC (5.00)
Universidad del Atlántico - UA: wins 0/6 categories
Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti - FPA: wins 0/6 categories
Porto School of Economics and Management: wins 0/6 categories
Ekiti State University - EKSU: wins 0/6 categories
Afe Babalola University - ABUAD: wins 0/6 categories
IAEC University - IAEC: wins 6/6 categories
University of Azuay - UDA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Business Economics
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: International Relations and Diplomacy
Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
3.71
3.33
3.40
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.33
3.62
4.67
3.56
3.07
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.00
3.71
4.00
3.37
3.93
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
4.33
3.93
4.67
3.79
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Value
3.83
4.43
4.33
4.03
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.17
3.23
4.00
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic standards and skilled professors
  • +Expansive campus with beautiful views and recreational facilities
  • +Wide range of programs and affordability as a public institution
  • +High-quality, practical education and relevant programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Positive personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Accessible and supportive professors
  • +Strong career connections and employability
  • +Affordable tuition for acquired knowledge
  • +Passionate lecturers teaching life skills and academic knowledge
  • +Rigorous academic environment preparing students for future challenges
  • +Supportive relationships between lecturers and students
  • +Excellent lecturers and learning environment
  • +Strong academic quality and personal development
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Progressive academic curriculum in a secure and accommodating atmosphere
  • +Expansive, career-focussed learning modules
  • +State-of-the-art, internationally competitive facilities
  • +Strong academics, practical education, and qualified professors
  • +Focus on global/regional understanding and interdisciplinary connections
  • +Collaborative learning and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Inconsistent and poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unengaging curriculum and lack of practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Facilities and resources are often described as outdated or inadequate.
  • -Communication and support from instructors and staff are sometimes lacking.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor response times cause frustration.
  • -Negative interactions with administrative staff create a hostile environment.
  • -Underutilized or ineffective facility usage hinders practical learning.
  • -Authoritarian management and suppressed student rights.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unclear academic processes and poor communication.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a strong 4.33. **Professors** and **Internationality** also receive positive marks at 4. The **Value** is rated at 3.83. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.67 and **Accomodation**, which scores the lowest at 3.17.

An excellent rating for value stands out, indicating strong perceived benefit for students. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area for improvement. Other aspects like professors and student life scored highly, while facilities, location, and internationality were rated moderately well. This profile presents a generally positive university experience with a key strength in value and a notable weakness in housing.

With excellent marks in location and student life, this university shines brightly in those areas. Professors, accommodation, and internationality also received strong scores. The value proposition is particularly appealing, with a rating well above average. The weakest area, though still respectable, is facilities, which scored lower than other aspects.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **value** for money, achieving a rating of 4.03, closely followed by the quality of its **professors** at 4.0. Conversely, **facilities** represent the area with the lowest score, rating 3.40. **Student life** is also a positive aspect, earning 3.79. Other assessed areas like **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** fall in the mid-range.

Academic aspects and overall value receive high marks, with Facilities, Professors, and Value all scoring an impressive 4.17. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.0. Internationality shows a strong score of 3.93. The university's weakest area, according to the ratings, is its Location, which received a score of 3.07.

The university garners perfect scores in every assessed category. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated exceptionally. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas based on this rating system.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving a solid but comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83% 4-5 stars) and highlight strong academic programs and a large, beautiful campus. Minor concerns (~0% 1-2 stars) about potential strikes and administrative communication exist.

With a 4.13 average rating from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students praise strategic location, conducive learning environment, and quality education. A minor suggestion for laboratory equipment upgrades was noted.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting accessible and amazing professors, helpful teachers, and valuable connections to the professional world. This ~100% positive sentiment reflects strong satisfaction with academic support and career opportunities.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate teaching, goal setting, and impactful life lessons. Negative feedback (~8.3%) cites administrative issues and inefficient processes.

~96.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent lecturers, good learning environments, and modern facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned authoritarian founder and trampled rights.

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights an exceptional academic curriculum, progressive impact on students, and a secure, serene learning atmosphere supported by state-of-the-art facilities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, deep understanding of global issues, and personal growth. They also praise qualified professors and modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
27%
33%
18%
41%
100%
50%
4★
50%
60%
67%
47%
48%
0%
50%
3★
17%
13%
0%
27%
7%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

My HND program experience in FedPoly Ado Ekiti

My time at Federal Polytechnic ADO EKITI was a life changing experience that helped me develop into a well rounded person in addition to giving me the technical skills I required for my job. My professional and personal development are still influenced by the events and lessons i've learned.

Nothing to show

Challenging but rewarding experience

Ekiti State University offers solid academic programs and has dedicated lecturers who work hard to support students. The school provides opportunities for growth and learning, but like many public universities in Nigeria, it faces challenges such as strikes, limited facilities, and occasional delays in the academic calendar. The campus environment is lively, and students often create their own support networks to make the most of their time there. Overall, EKSU gives you the chance to earn a good education, but patience and adaptability are definitely needed.

LL.B

I studied law and it was theoretical and practical. The lecturers were good and they tried to be hands-on with the students. The university always upgraded itself. It always looked for ways to be better for the students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close