St. Paul's University - SPU vs Kenya Aeronautical College vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Bridge College vs Pioneer International University - PIU

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 1/6 categories
Kenya Aeronautical College: wins 5/6 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/6 categories
Pioneer International University - PIU: wins 0/6 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/6 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Aviation Law and Professional Pilot License
Best programme: Software Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
5.00
Win
3.83
Not rated
4.50
3.75
Not rated
Location
4.60
5.00
Win
4.29
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
5.00
4.14
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.27
5.00
Win
3.43
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.71
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.50
2.75
Not rated
Value
4.73
Win
4.00
3.86
Not rated
4.50
4.25
Not rated
Accommodation
4.58
5.00
Win
3.86
Not rated
3.50
2.25
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Extensive aviation course selection
  • +Supportive, experienced instructors
  • +Hands-on practical training opportunities
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible faculty and personalized learning
  • +Practical, hands-on education
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Unsupportive or unavailable instructors negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

This institution garners near-perfect scores in almost every aspect, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all receiving a top rating of 5. The only slight dip is observed in value, which is rated a solid 4. Overall, this indicates an outstanding university experience with exceptional strengths across the board.

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

Nothing to show

An overall strong performance is evident, with the university excelling in **Professors (5/5)** and **Facilities (4.5/5)**, and offering excellent **Value (4.5/5)**. Areas that appear less developed include **Location (3/5)** and **Student Life (3.5/5)**, which received moderate ratings. Internationality also scored well at 4/5.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

With a single review and an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the variety of aviation courses and experienced, supportive instructors.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, accessible faculty, and a supportive, hands-on learning environment. The university offers diverse courses and good campus maintenance.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
0%
43%
0%
50%
25%
0%
4★
46%
100%
57%
0%
50%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close