Graduate School of Management - GSM vs Linnaeus University - LNU vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs Ctl Eurocollege vs upGrad
Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inclusive and social learning environment
- +Opportunities for friendship and diverse interaction
- +Supportive and helpful professors and staff.
- +Good facilities and diverse academic programs.
- +Welcoming international environment and convenient resources.
- +Modern campus with diverse programs and extracurricular activities
- +Attentive and available staff
- +Practical training and professional opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging lectures and passionate faculty
- +High-quality training and learning experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly concerning international student affairs.
- -Mediocre teaching quality with limited value beyond independent learning.
- -Lack of industry connections and career support.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, achieving a perfect score for Value and high marks across Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. However, Accommodation received a lower rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement within the university's offerings.
Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks. The institution particularly excelled in Internationality (4.27) and Student Life (4.23), reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus environment. Facilities (4.16) and Professors (4.12) also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, Value (3.81) and Location (3.83) were the lowest-rated categories, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Accommodations also scored moderately (3.92).
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. The university performs well in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. While **Value** is also strong at 4.5, these three areas represent the relative lowest scores in its otherwise impressive profile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic strengths are evident, with professors receiving a perfect score of 5. Value for money also stands out at 4. However, the university faces challenges in its location and student life, both scoring a low 2. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, as is internationality. Overall, the institution excels in teaching quality but has areas needing significant improvement in campus experience and accessibility.
The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It highlights a friendly learning environment that fosters socialization and diverse interactions. No negative feedback was recorded.
About 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and good facilities. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback points to issues with teaching quality and administrative support.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting a modern campus with numerous activities and an attentive staff. Students also appreciate the diversified, practice-oriented programs with multiple sector choices.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review is positive, rating 4/5. It praises engaging lectures, campus passion, and quality training. A minor suggestion was made for updating machinery and improving cleanliness in the wellness center.
It is a friendly learning environment for students to enjoy learning and socialize, make friends and interact with people from diverse ethnicities and nationalities. Therefore, I recommend this University to people seeking a good university to study.
Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5 — one extra star because tuition was free) I studied Software Technology at Linnaeus University between 2022 and 2025. In my experience, the quality of teaching was mediocre. I quickly stopped attending lectures because most added little beyond what I could learn independently. Industry connections were almost nonexistent: no internship support, no company-led workshops, no hackathons, and no clear pathways into the tech sector. The only recurring event was the annual job fair, but many representatives seemed unsure what they were seeking; most offered no internships or projects and there was rarely any follow-up, so it felt more promotional than student-focused. Entrepreneurship support was minimal. When we started a student project, there was no funding, no events, no network, and very limited guidance — essentially just one counsellor providing basic advice. Faculty culture felt very political and unresponsive to student feedback. When issues were raised formally, they were often dismissed, though quiet changes were occasionally made later. I personally experienced hostile and dismissive behaviour from a lecturer in the tech faculty, which I reported to the Student Union in 2024 along with other classmates. The case was closed in the lecturer’s favour, yet the university quietly implemented some of the changes we had requested. The complaint process left me uncertain about its independence, and I believe there’s a need for more transparent procedures and external oversight. On the positive side, there are a few excellent professors who genuinely care about their students and involve them in research, but they are a small minority and you have to actively seek them out. Overall, I’m deeply disappointed with the university’s approach to education and student development. I feel I wasted three years of potential growth and opportunity here. Prospective students should do thorough research and speak directly with current students before enrolling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
