Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs International University of Grand-Bassam - IUGB vs Okan University vs Colliery Training College - CTC vs University of Agriculture Faisalabad

Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Okan University (5.00)
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/6 categories
International University of Grand-Bassam - IUGB: wins 0/6 categories
Okan University: wins 6/6 categories
Colliery Training College - CTC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Agriculture Faisalabad: wins 0/6 categories
State University of Malang - UM: wins 0/6 categories
Université pour le développement communautaire de Guinée - UDECOM-GUINEE: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Istanbul, Turkey
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Witbank, South Africa
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.95
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.17
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.23
5.00
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.15
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.90
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
4.06
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.83
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.90
4.60
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.06
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.77
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.80
4.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
  • +High-quality teaching and skilled lecturers
  • +Diverse student community and supportive environment
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and extracurricular engagement
  • +Supportive environment for new students and ample opportunities for involvement
  • +Rigorous academics demanding hard work and dedication

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and cooperative faculty and staff
  • +Balanced academic rigor with practical application and hands-on learning
  • +Good facilities, including grounds, labs, and hostels, at affordable costs
  • +Supportive and inspiring faculty
  • +Affordable cost of living and study
  • +Positive and student-friendly city environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and poor teaching are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are prevalent.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and not updated.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detracted from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacted studies.
  • -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
  • -Insufficient parking availability.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

The university demonstrates a generally positive performance across key areas. Location and Professors are notably strong points, receiving the highest marks. Student Life and Internationality also score well. Facilities and Accommodations are areas for potential improvement, showing the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories, though still at a respectable level. Value also performed well.

Across the board, this institution receives excellent evaluations, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every assessed area. Notably, its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and location are all highlighted as exemplary. The value proposition is also rated as outstanding, suggesting a highly positive experience for students in all aspects of their university journey.

Nothing to show

Performance across various aspects reveals a positive university profile. The institution excels in its **Location**, boasting a high rating of 4.4. **Value** and **Internationality** also stand out with strong scores of 4.2 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.5, while **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated a solid 3.9. **Accomodation** also scores well at 3.8.

This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

With a 4.06 average rating from 68 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise good teaching quality, skilled lecturers, and a diverse community. Some suggest curriculum updates, particularly in computer skills.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded. The single review highlights opportunities for new students, requiring effort, and mentions numerous clubs and societies.

Nothing to show

Nine out of ten reviews are positive, with students highlighting cooperative professors and staff, good infrastructure, and a student-friendly environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
25%
100%
0%
30%
83%
0%
4★
75%
56%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
3★
0%
19%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Education, Quality and opportunity

Overall I think IUGB is a good university, an international one, so we have the opportunity to get in touch with people coming from different countries. During my times there, I really enjoyed being involved in the community. They have many clubs and activities. I enjoyed the courses too. The teachers were good and patient with students, especially in my department(MET). They work hard now to get each students, a chance to be part of the professional life by finding internship or contrats etc. The fees and tuition are a little bit high but I think for the work quality they show it’s a good bet. I would recommend IUGB for sure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close