London School of Commerce - LSC vs BRAC University vs Prime University - PU vs Dhaka Imperial College - DIC vs Bangladesh University

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/3 categories
BRAC University: wins 0/3 categories
Prime University - PU: wins 0/3 categories
Dhaka Imperial College - DIC: wins 0/3 categories
Bangladesh University: wins 1/3 categories
UCSI University Bangladesh Branch Campus: wins 2/3 categories
Notre Dame University Bangladesh: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.40
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Science
Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Business Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.29
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.44
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.65
5.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.24
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.53
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
4.59
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.65
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +quality education and practical industry focus
  • +supportive and experienced faculty
  • +positive campus environment and facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Affordable tuition
  • +Friendly campus environment
  • +Dedicated faculty and structured guidance
  • +Inspiring and caring environment
  • +Effective academic support and progress
  • +Cooperative and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Supportive administration and academic environment
  • +Practical and theoretical course design
  • +strong blend of business and IT
  • +knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +well-structured curriculum

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and slow responses.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Education quality and faculty engagement are lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support from administration and ineffective management create frustration.
  • -Curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring and irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary equipment frustrate students.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching quality leads to a poor learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues create frustration.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant or not practical for real-world application.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Professors receive an exceptionally high rating, complemented by excellent scores for Student Life and Value. Location and Facilities also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects, though Internationality remains at a respectable level.

This institution scores exceptionally well in key areas, with professors and location receiving perfect marks. Facilities, student life, and accommodation are also strong points, earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's internationality is its weakest area, rated at 3. Overall, the university presents a highly positive profile, particularly regarding teaching quality and campus accessibility, with good but less outstanding performance in attracting a diverse international student body.

This institution shines in several key areas, with perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Accommodations and Internationality are also well-regarded, each receiving a 4. The university's strongest attributes are clearly its academic resources, teaching quality, and vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the Location received a score of 0, indicating it is a significant weakness in its overall profile. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating a highly supportive and engaging environment. Professors and internationality are also strong points, both rated a solid 4. The university demonstrates good value for students, also earning a 4. The weakest area, relative to its excellent performance elsewhere, is the professor rating.

With several perfect scores, the university excels in several key areas. Professors, location, internationality, and overall value all received top marks. Student life and facilities are also highly rated, scoring a solid four. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, with a rating of three, indicating potential for improvement in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

~94% of 17 reviews are positive, praising qualified faculty, practical learning, and a professional academic environment. A small fraction of feedback highlights administrative issues.

With a perfect 5/5 rating from one review, this university offers a solid academic foundation and supportive faculty. Students appreciate its affordability and student-friendly campus. There's a suggestion for more research opportunities and career guidance.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback highlights strong faculty support and dedicated teachers, alongside regular exams and proper guidance. This structured system and inspiring environment are noted as beneficial for academic improvement.

With one review at 4/5 stars, the feedback is highly positive, highlighting a good academic environment with cooperative faculty and supportive administration. No negative feedback was received.

With a single review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This indicates a highly positive sentiment, with ~100% of feedback being positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
59%
100%
100%
0%
100%
0%
4★
25%
35%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close