Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University vs University of Media Arts and Communications - Unimac

Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Maseno University: wins 3/6 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 1/6 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/6 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Media Arts and Communications - Unimac : wins 0/6 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/6 categories
Bangladesh University of Textiles: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Bachelor of Communication Studies
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Textile Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.88
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.49
4.00
Not rated
4.25
4.40
Not rated
4.50
Win
Internationality
3.97
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.63
2.60
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.21
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.75
3.60
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.53
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.38
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
1.80
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities
  • +Practical skills integrated with theory
  • +Real-world exposure and hands-on experience
  • +Career path development and professional skill improvement

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical foundation from labs and coursework
  • +Renowned textile education in the sub-continent
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates uncertainty.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a mixed performance. The institution excels in its **Professors (4.4)** and **Value (4)**, indicating strong academic quality and affordability. Conversely, **Accomodation (1.8)** presents a significant weakness, alongside a lower score for **Internationality (2.6)**. Other areas like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its professors and location, both scoring 4.5 and 5 respectively. Student life and facilities also perform well, earning a solid 4. Accommodations and internationality are areas with room for improvement, indicated by ratings of 3.5. Overall, the university offers a good value for students, with a rating of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Most feedback is positive (~80%), highlighting strong career path development and a blend of theoretical and practical learning. A small portion (~20%) of reviews noted limited on-campus practical opportunities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates a highly positive experience, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight strong foundational learning and excellent lab facilities, particularly for textile engineering.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
50%
0%
63%
0%
0%
50%
4★
31%
50%
0%
25%
80%
0%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
13%
20%
0%
50%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close