University of Management and Technology - UMT vs Gabriele D'Annunzio University of Chieti - Pescara - UdA vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK
Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and dedicated, approachable faculty
- +Engaging campus life and student support
- +Holistic development and transformative experiences
- +Supportive faculty and blended theory/practice programs
- +Wide range of well-organized courses and academic excellence
- +Welcoming international environment and good campus facilities
- +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
- +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
- +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
- +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
- +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
- +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Holistic learning and diverse activities
- +Quality education and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause a lack of action on student requests.
- -Frequent and unjustified fee increases are a major concern.
- -Some teachers lack fundamental subject knowledge.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and guidance leave students feeling unprepared.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
Nothing to show
This institution shows its strongest performance in value for money, alongside positive ratings for professors and student life. Facilities and internationality also receive solid scores. However, areas such as location and accommodation fall slightly below the average, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.
This university presents a compelling overall picture, with its strongest attributes lying in **Value** (4.375) and **Professors** (4.25). Location also receives a solid rating of 4. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.57. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a good range, indicating a generally positive university experience.
Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.
This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.
Nothing to show
Most students (~74%) report a vibrant atmosphere with dedicated faculty, diverse programs, and engaging campus life. A small percentage (~11%) noted issues with subject teacher knowledge and administrative management.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), praising supportive professors and well-organized programs. Students appreciate the enriching international environment and good facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
I think UMT provides a good learning environment with modern facilities and a strong focus on professional development. The faculty is supportive, and there are plenty of opportunities for growth. However, the fee structure can be a bit high for some students.
Nothing to show
I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show