Üsküdar University vs Maseno University vs Brno University of Technology vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK

Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Üsküdar University: wins 1/5 categories
Maseno University: wins 2/5 categories
Brno University of Technology: wins 2/5 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 0/5 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/5 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/5 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Istanbul, Turkey
4.30
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Win
4.14
4.33
4.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.31
4.67
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.17
4.49
Win
4.17
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
3.97
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.63
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.21
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.53
Win
4.33
4.50
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
3.98
3.83
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Comprehensive and modern academic programs
  • +Supportive and accessible staff and faculty
  • +Welcoming and diverse international student community
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong interdisciplinary programmes and innovation culture
  • +Excellent facilities, cutting-edge labs, and industry collaboration
  • +Vibrant student community and city integration
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor education quality with unqualified teachers and unresponsive support.
  • -High cost with little value received.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks for its facilities and location, both receiving 4.5 stars. Its internationality also stands out with a score of 4.33. Conversely, accommodation presents as a relative weakness, rated at 3.8. Other areas like professors, student life, and value fall within a good to very good range, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution receives particularly strong acclaim for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. **Internationality** also ranks highly at 4.5. While most aspects are rated positively, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.8. **Facilities** and **Value** are solid with scores of 4.3, and **Professors** are rated 4.2.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), highlighting strong academic programs, approachable faculty, and excellent international student support. A small minority (~17%) report issues with education quality and responsiveness.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise the university's interdisciplinary programs, innovation culture, modern facilities, and supportive community, alongside the student-friendly city of Brno.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
83%
60%
17%
50%
0%
63%
0%
4★
0%
31%
83%
50%
0%
25%
0%
3★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close