University of Management and Technology - UMT vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University
Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and dedicated, approachable faculty
- +Engaging campus life and student support
- +Holistic development and transformative experiences
- +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
- +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
- +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
- +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
- +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
- +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Holistic learning and diverse activities
- +Quality education and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Strong practical foundation from labs and coursework
- +Renowned textile education in the sub-continent
- -Administrative and management issues cause a lack of action on student requests.
- -Frequent and unjustified fee increases are a major concern.
- -Some teachers lack fundamental subject knowledge.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates uncertainty.
This institution shows its strongest performance in value for money, alongside positive ratings for professors and student life. Facilities and internationality also receive solid scores. However, areas such as location and accommodation fall slightly below the average, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.
Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.
This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks for its professors and location, both scoring 4.5 and 5 respectively. Student life and facilities also perform well, earning a solid 4. Accommodations and internationality are areas with room for improvement, indicated by ratings of 3.5. Overall, the university offers a good value for students, with a rating of 4.
Most students (~74%) report a vibrant atmosphere with dedicated faculty, diverse programs, and engaging campus life. A small percentage (~11%) noted issues with subject teacher knowledge and administrative management.
With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates a highly positive experience, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight strong foundational learning and excellent lab facilities, particularly for textile engineering.
I think UMT provides a good learning environment with modern facilities and a strong focus on professional development. The faculty is supportive, and there are plenty of opportunities for growth. However, the fee structure can be a bit high for some students.
I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show