Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC (5.00)
Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 1/7 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.69
Win
4.50
4.20
4.17
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Location
4.17
Win
4.00
3.40
3.67
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Professors
4.52
4.25
4.60
4.00
5.00
Win
1.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.43
Win
3.00
3.20
2.71
2.00
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.31
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Value
4.33
4.25
4.40
4.57
Win
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.05
4.25
Win
3.60
3.20
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
  • +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
  • +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.
  • +Supportive learning environment and quality programs
  • +Welcoming and student-friendly atmosphere
  • +Financial accessibility and athletic opportunities
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** (4.5) and strong scores for **Professors** (4.25) and **Value** (4.25), suggesting a positive learning environment and good return on investment. **Accommodation** also receives a high rating (4.25). The weakest area, **Internationality**, with a score of 3, indicates room for improvement in global engagement. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated well at 4.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are highly positive, highlighting supportive staff and a great learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
33%
83%
38%
100%
0%
0%
4★
34%
33%
0%
25%
0%
50%
0%
3★
2%
33%
17%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close