Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito (4.70)
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 5/5 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/5 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/5 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/5 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.33
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.67
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
20%
43%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
40%
29%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close