Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 0/7 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
3.98
4.60
4.33
4.86
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.54
Win
3.95
4.00
4.33
4.43
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.69
4.52
4.67
4.00
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.31
4.29
4.67
3.00
3.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.54
Win
4.44
4.20
3.67
4.29
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.62
4.33
4.17
4.00
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
Win
3.80
4.00
4.00
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Innovative and practical programs with real-world application
  • +Supportive and experienced instructors
  • +Valuable facilities and career opportunities
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often deemed inadequate.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

With a robust showing in several key areas, this university excels in its **Facilities**, earning a near-perfect score. **Value** and **Professors** also received commendably high marks. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. While **Student Life** and **Accomodation** received solid scores, they represent areas with room for growth when compared to the university's strongest attributes.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

Reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise excellent facilities, well-maintained equipment, and innovative programs. Technical and soft skills development, along with valuable professor support, are frequently mentioned.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
61%
58%
86%
20%
43%
100%
0%
4★
39%
38%
14%
40%
57%
0%
0%
3★
0%
4%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close