Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO vs Universidad Libre - UniLibre vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 0/3 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 1/3 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 2/3 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.67
4.00
5.00
2.33
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
4.67
4.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.50
4.67
5.00
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
2.00
3.67
5.00
Win
3.50
2.33
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.50
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
2.67
Not rated
3.33
Value
5.00
4.33
4.00
5.00
2.67
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.00
3.67
4.00
5.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
100%
100%
33%
33%
0%
100%
4★
33%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close