Kyiv International University - KyIU vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University vs National Aviation University vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Kyiv International University - KyIU: wins 2/6 categories
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/6 categories
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University: wins 0/6 categories
National Aviation University: wins 0/6 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 4/6 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/6 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/6 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent and supportive teachers
  • +High-level organization and clear information
  • +Interesting and well-structured classes
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong community
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor English proficiency among professors.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. However, the university's accommodation offerings present a significant weakness, with a rating of 0. Overall, the value is rated positively at 4, indicating a generally well-regarded experience despite the accommodation issue.

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

Nothing to show

This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, student reviews highlight excellent teachers and high-level organization. Positive comments also mention clear information and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

Nothing to show

The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close