Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
- +Pleasant campus environment
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
- +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
- +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
- +High academic quality and relevant programs
- +Strong English language focus
- +Blend of nature and academic facilities
- +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
- +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
- +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.
- +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
- +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
- +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
- -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.
This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.
Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.
This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show