EU Business School vs University of Lausanne - UNIL vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs BHMS Business & Hotel Management School - B.H.M.S vs Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts - HSLU
Side-by-side comparison from 327 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable staff and teachers
- +Interactive classes with practical applications
- +International and diverse student environment
- +Supportive lecturers & practical courses
- +Active student life & events
- +Flexible major changes
- +Strong global network and personal growth
- +Practical industry experience and diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
Nothing to show
- +Extensive industry exposure and networking opportunities
- +Comprehensive curriculum covering sport business and technology
- +International and diverse student body with engaging collaborations
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -The quality of education is considered basic, with a lack of proper study facilities and accreditation concerns.
- -Extracurricular activities are not supported, and the university prioritizes attendance over educational quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Poor staff attitude and a lack of care for students are significant issues.
- -Unfulfilled promises and misleading information create a negative student experience.
- -Inadequate facilities and miserable conditions contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application frustrates students.
Excelling in several key areas, this university boasts impressive scores for **Location** and **Internationality**, both near perfect. **Student Life** also received a very positive assessment. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker point, receiving the lowest rating. The university also earned solid marks for **Facilities** and **Professors**, with **Value** falling in the mid-range.
This institution garners praise for its academic offerings and setting, with Professors scoring an impressive 4.75 and Location an equally strong 4.5. Student Life and Facilities are rated well at 4, while Value also stands out at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, both receiving a 3.75.
Exhibiting particularly strong performance, the university achieved its highest rating in Internationality, followed closely by Facilities and Student Life. Conversely, Location received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other well-regarded areas include Accomodation, Value, and Professors, all scoring well above average.
This institution receives its highest marks for Location, with a perfect score. Student Life and Internationality are also strong areas, both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, Value for Money is the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Facilities and Professors, which also received moderate scores. Accommodations fall in the middle range of ratings.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners impressive scores in several key areas. The location and internationality stand out with exceptionally high ratings, suggesting a vibrant and globally connected campus. Professors also receive strong marks, indicating quality instruction. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Student life and facilities are rated well, though not reaching the exceptional levels of location or internationality.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong student-staff relationships and a welcoming atmosphere. However, about 7% of feedback notes disorganization, basic curriculum, and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight supportive lecturers, well-structured courses, and good campus life.
With an average rating of 4.77/5 from 57 reviews, ~95% highlight positive experiences. Recurring themes include skill development and valuable internships. No negative feedback was reported.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, industry connections, and supportive lecturers. Two reviews (about 22%) express dissatisfaction with staff rudeness and perceived broken promises.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
Nothing to show
All 11 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.82/5. Students praise the program's organization, diverse course content, and unparalleled networking opportunities within the international sports industry.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
To be honest compared to other universities BHMS did not strike me as a great choice in the first place. However, the 2 semesters per year, where in the first one you study and in the second one you do an internship is a really great way of learning. I have gotten great opportunities and met many people here. I would like to highlight my professor; Mr. Marcel Enzler. He is an amazing lecturer who truly believes in his students and also tries to elevate the school to the best of his abilities. After doing my studies here for 3 years, I would like to see them make the first and second year curriculum fit the industry requirements and standards. Because they are very easy courses and once you are in third year you start struggling a lot. Other than that I immensely enjoyed my time here.
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
Nothing to show
The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.
