ESSCA School of Management vs Rani Channamma University, Belagavi - RCUB vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Comilla University - COU vs Ruposhi Bangla College

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ruposhi Bangla College (5.00)
ESSCA School of Management: wins 1/7 categories
Rani Channamma University, Belagavi - RCUB: wins 4/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
Comilla University - COU: wins 0/7 categories
Ruposhi Bangla College: wins 2/7 categories
Britannia University: wins 0/7 categories
CCN University of Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: AI in Project Management
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Comilla, Bangladesh
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Political Science
Comilla, Bangladesh
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Science
Comilla, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.81
3.33
3.25
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.17
5.00
Win
4.75
3.63
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.94
4.33
Win
3.25
3.88
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.88
Win
3.67
3.50
3.63
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.13
5.00
Win
3.75
3.88
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.75
4.33
Win
2.75
3.63
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.41
3.67
2.00
3.13
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
  • +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
  • +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
  • +Academic excellence and practical knowledge focus
  • +Welcoming and engaging campus environment
  • +Exceptional library resources
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Opportunities for academic and personal growth
  • +Well-organized environment and structured programs
  • +Strong academic foundation and supportive teachers
  • +Encouraging and disciplined learning atmosphere
  • +Well-organized classes and regular assessments

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
  • -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
  • -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and academic support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Frustrating administrative and communication issues are a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.

An evaluation of the university reveals a strong emphasis on student experience and academic quality, with Location and Student Life both achieving perfect scores. Professors and Value also received excellent ratings. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, which scored moderately, and Accomodation and Internationality, which scored slightly higher but remain less exceptional than other aspects.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This university presents a generally positive profile across key areas. Its strongest attributes lie in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 3.875. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also receive solid marks between 3.5 and 3.625. The lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, coming in at 3.125.

This institution demonstrates a notably strong performance across most assessed areas, with excellent ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, all receiving a score of 4. The primary area for improvement is Internationality, which scored a significantly lower 2. Value for money also received a high rating of 4, suggesting a positive overall experience for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 based on 3 reviews, student feedback is ~100% positive. Recurring themes highlight academic excellence, excellent facilities, and a supportive campus environment.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With an average rating of 3.88/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting good academic environments, knowledgeable faculty, and personal growth opportunities. Limited negative feedback exists regarding administrative processes and departmental cooperation.

The single review for Ruposhi Bangla College is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This feedback emphasizes a strong academic environment focused on building fundamentals for higher studies, supported by experienced and encouraging teachers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
67%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
41%
33%
25%
88%
0%
0%
0%
3★
19%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close