University of Carthage - UCAR vs University of Tunis El Manar vs Institut Supérieur des Technologies Médicales de Tunis vs Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT vs Manouba University

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT (4.00)
University of Carthage - UCAR: wins 1/6 categories
University of Tunis El Manar: wins 2/6 categories
Institut Supérieur des Technologies Médicales de Tunis: wins 0/6 categories
Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT: wins 3/6 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/6 categories
Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades - ISET RADES: wins 0/6 categories
UPES Megrine - UPES : wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
1.50
2.83
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
2.50
Not rated
3.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.00
3.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Practical, real-world focused curriculum
  • +Strong academic foundation and challenging programs
  • +Outstanding professors and valuable support
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical teaching methods and effective professors
  • +Opportunities for leadership and campus involvement

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Uncooperative staff
  • -Discouraging reliance on the institution
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Ineffective systems and a lack of educational structure are noted.
  • -Subpar or outdated materials are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and limited course options.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance based on student feedback. The **strongest areas** are Location (4) and Professors (3.5), suggesting a positive experience with campus surroundings and academic staff. Conversely, Accomodation (1) and Facilities (1.5) are identified as the **weakest points**, indicating significant room for improvement in these crucial aspects of campus living. Student Life and Internationality received moderate scores, while Value sits at a lower end.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professors and value for money, both receiving high marks. Student life also garners a positive rating. Conversely, the university's facilities and internationality are areas that received lower scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Accommodations and location fall within a moderate range of feedback.

Nothing to show

Performance across key university metrics reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in attracting high-quality faculty, evidenced by a perfect score for professors, and offers exceptional value for students. Conversely, facilities and location are areas needing significant improvement, both receiving low ratings. Student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into the mid-range, suggesting a generally adequate but not outstanding experience in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 2.5/5 from two reviews, 50% of feedback was negative. Students cited unorganized administration and uncooperative staff as concerns.

University reviews indicate a strong academic foundation and vibrant student life for ~74% of students. Professors are highly regarded, and programs show good job market alignment. A small portion of feedback (~17%) criticizes poor management and a lack of structure.

Nothing to show

This university has a high average rating of 4/5 stars. Feedback highlights effective teaching methods and practical learning experiences. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

terrible

I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close