University of Chittagong - CU vs Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology - CUET vs Chowmuhani Government Saleh Ahmed College vs Government City College Chattogram - GCC

Side-by-side comparison from 128 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology - CUET (4.00)
University of Chittagong - CU: wins 2/7 categories
Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology - CUET: wins 4/7 categories
Chowmuhani Government Saleh Ahmed College: wins 0/7 categories
Government City College Chattogram - GCC: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Chittagong, Bangladesh
3.90
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Sociology
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.63
Win
3.52
Not rated
2.00
Location
4.29
3.19
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.75
3.92
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
3.28
Win
3.18
Not rated
1.00
Student life
3.72
4.03
Win
Not rated
3.00
Value
3.59
3.99
Win
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.53
4.01
Win
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Transformative academic and personal growth
  • +Strong faculty and supportive learning environment
  • +Unique community atmosphere and natural campus beauty
  • +Excellent educational environment and dedicated faculty.
  • +High-speed internet in residences is a welcome improvement.
  • +Fosters personal growth and discipline despite academic pressure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Session jams and delayed results due to uncompleted subjects and poor teacher communication.
  • -Lack of adequate dormitories and insufficient transportation.
  • -Issues with corruption, politics, nepotism, and outdated curriculum practices.
  • -Outdated academic environment, rules, and teaching approaches.
  • -Ineffective instructors and mismatched syllabus for assessments.
  • -Strict attendance policies coupled with monotonous and unengaging sessions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a strong performance in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **internationality** is an area that appears to be the weakest. Other categories such as student life, professors, and value also received solid ratings, while facilities and accommodation fall within a slightly lower but still respectable range.

Student life and accommodation stand out as particularly strong aspects of this university, both scoring above 4.0. Professors and value for money also receive high marks, nearing the 4.0 threshold. Conversely, facilities and internationality are the lowest-rated areas, while location also shows room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a transformative community, unique atmosphere, and natural campus beauty. A small portion of feedback, around 6%, mentions issues like session jams and limited dorms.

Roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting educational facilities and a strong academic culture. A small percentage of negative feedback points to issues with residency facilities and some instructors' teaching approaches.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
32%
0%
0%
4★
28%
41%
0%
0%
3★
31%
22%
0%
100%
2★
3%
4%
0%
0%
1★
3%
1%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
One of the best universities in the Country

I got admission to this university after acing my college years. I got admission to the biological sciences and I must say it was one of the best experiences of my life. The faculty is the best and very cooperative. The building is in a very good state and all the essential equipment is available. You have complete freedom of doing research work and professors help you in your tasks. I am also planning to do my masters from here too.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close