Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT vs University of Saskatchewan vs Clark University vs Technical University of Mombasa - TUM vs Kenya Coast National Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT: wins 0/4 categories
University of Saskatchewan: wins 0/4 categories
Clark University: wins 0/4 categories
Technical University of Mombasa - TUM: wins 0/4 categories
Kenya Coast National Polytechnic: wins 0/4 categories
Jouf University: wins 0/4 categories
London College of the Contemporary Arts: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Mathematics and Computer Science
Best programme: Civil Engineering
skaka, Saudi Arabia
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Media and Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.24
4.50
3.67
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
3.74
5.00
4.23
5.00
2.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
4.50
4.14
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.57
5.00
3.05
5.00
1.00
5.00
Student life
Not rated
3.94
4.50
3.82
5.00
2.00
5.00
Value
Not rated
3.95
4.50
4.14
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
3.71
4.00
3.59
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and accessible teaching styles.
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty and staff.
  • +Vibrant student community and extracurriculars.
  • +Dedicated, helpful professors
  • +Active learning and research opportunities
  • +Supportive campus environment and resources
  • +Practical and rich specialized courses
  • +Knowledgeable and engaging professors
  • +Welcoming and interactive environment
  • +Supportive, friendly lecturers and useful, real-world curriculum
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and moderate fees
  • +Prime coastal location and positive campus atmosphere
  • +Practical, industry-based training
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Competent, job-ready graduates

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, industry-focused projects
  • +International and creative environment
  • +Creative freedom and exploration
Cons
  • -Teachers are boring and teaching methods are unengaging.
  • -The curriculum often feels outdated.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum diminish interest.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Lack of practical experience and institutional partnerships.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative and management processes.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a neutral rating of 0. This indicates that no single area stands out as particularly strong or weak in the current assessment. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated equally, suggesting an average or unremarkable performance in each domain.

This institution receives its highest marks for Internationality, indicating a strong global presence. Professors are also highly rated, suggesting a dedicated faculty. Conversely, the university's weakest areas appear to be Location and Accommodation, both receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Value are rated moderately well, while Facilities fall slightly above average.

This institution demonstrates an excellent overall profile. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings. Accommodations are the weakest point, scoring a 4, though still very positive. The value proposition is also rated highly at 4.5.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback with its strongest areas being Location and Professors, both receiving high marks. Value is also rated highly. Conversely, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating compared to other categories. Facilities and Accomodation are rated moderately, while Student Life also falls into the mid-range of assessments.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Value are also strong areas, each rated a solid 4. The standout areas demonstrate a vibrant and well-connected campus experience, while the other categories reflect a high-quality and rewarding educational investment.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves top marks across all assessed categories, indicating a consistently excellent experience. With perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weakest areas. The university presents a uniformly outstanding profile for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is negative (1-2 stars), giving an average rating of 2/5. This feedback, representing ~100% of reviews, highlights boring teachers and a lack of engaging instruction.

With an average rating of 4.41/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise the quality of classes, helpful professors, and supportive learning environment. Some note the city's small size as a drawback.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 0% negative feedback, student reviews highlight practical and rich specialized courses. Professors are noted as knowledgeable and friendly, fostering an enjoyable and welcoming learning environment.

With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 22 reviews, ~82% are positive, highlighting friendly lecturers, useful courses, and good facilities. A small fraction (~4.6%) of feedback noted insufficient practical exposure and institutional partnerships for technical courses.

With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review highlights the institution's reputation, diverse course offerings with a practical focus, and modern facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight creative and inspiring study experiences, appreciating practical projects and an international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
52%
50%
32%
100%
0%
100%
4★
0%
43%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
10%
0%
14%
0%
100%
0%
2★
100%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

STUDENT SUPPORT

It's a friendly environment to be in since it's located near the coastal beach, the top management usually offer spiritual growth and motivation to all students regardless of ones' faith or color. Also the tuition fees are moderate.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close