London School of Commerce - LSC vs RV University vs Mount Carmel College - MCC vs Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering - DSCE vs Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/7 categories
RV University: wins 0/7 categories
Mount Carmel College - MCC: wins 4/7 categories
Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering - DSCE: wins 0/7 categories
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: wins 0/7 categories
Garden City University - GCU: wins 2/7 categories
Bangalore Technological Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Sociology
Best programme: Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
3.44
Win
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.67
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
3.89
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.89
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.22
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
3.89
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.89
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and friendly faculty and staff
  • +Diverse subject combinations and exploration opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus life and strong student community
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and approachable instructors
  • +Practical and relevant course content

Nothing to show

  • +Inclusive and considerate learning environment
  • +Balanced academic and extracurricular focus

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Placement cell operates unethically and without accountability.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication from administration.
  • -Poor quality or outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

  • -Disappointing facilities and learning resources are a common complaint.
  • -Issues with administrative processes and communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Inflexible policies and a lack of responsiveness from staff are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest score, and a notably positive reception for **Student Life**. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring lower than other surveyed aspects. Other categories like Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all garnered strong, consistent ratings.

This institution presents a mixed performance according to the provided ratings. Its weakest areas are clearly facilities and accommodation, both receiving a score of 1. Conversely, professors and student life stand out as its strongest aspects, earning a respectable 3. The location and internationality scores indicate moderate strengths, while the overall value is rated low.

Nothing to show

With impressive scores in internationality and value, this institution excels in attracting global students and offering a worthwhile experience. However, the university's weakest areas lie in its location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving zero ratings. Facilities and professors are rated moderately at three stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise academic excellence, friendly faculty, and a beautiful campus. Some note minor drawbacks like lack of lifts.

A single review provides a 1/5 rating, reflecting ~100% negative sentiment. The feedback highlights significant issues with the placement cell, describing it as being run unethically with threats and blackmail.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the university's diversity, thoughtfulness in considering students, and the balance between academics and extracurriculars.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close