Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 3/7 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 4/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Win
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
100%
33%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close