Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

Exhibiting generally positive feedback, the university scores highest in Student Life, closely followed by Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving excellent marks. Facilities also perform well. Its weakest area, however, is Internationality, though still receiving a solid rating. Value for money is also highly regarded.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, and support for talent development. Some mention campus layout as a minor point.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.