University of Wroclaw - UWr vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Vistula University vs University of Lodz - UL vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 355 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Strong reputation and career opportunities
- +Inspiring community and passionate lecturers
- +Solid foundation in economics and useful resources
- +Diverse and inclusive international environment
- +Supportive and practical learning experience
- +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Passionate, qualified professors and supportive environment.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and student groups.
- +Strong academic programs with practical focus.
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Comprehensive curriculum and professional development
- +Vibrant student life and campus infrastructure
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Bureaucracy and administrative issues cause significant difficulties.
- -Online administrative services are problematic and unhelpful.
- -Excessive control over student organizations is a major concern.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
- -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, especially in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support for tasks.
- -Poor career prospects and limited opportunities after graduation.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program content and perceived lack of learning.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
This university garners positive feedback across most areas, with **Location** being the standout strength at 4.67. **Professors** (4.23) and **Value** (4.17) also received high marks. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point at 3.64, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are generally well-regarded.
With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
This university demonstrates a well-rounded performance according to recent ratings. Its **strongest area is Location**, achieving a score of 4.36, while **Accomodation received the lowest rating** at 3.55. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a respectable 3.8 to 4.1 range, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple aspects of university life.
This university garners particularly strong scores in **Internationality** (4.44) and **Location** (4.33). While **Professors** also receive a solid rating (4), other aspects show more moderate results. **Accommodations** present the lowest score (3), with **Facilities** and **Student Life** receiving similar mid-range ratings (3.78). **Value** falls slightly below these, at 3.67.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching, a good reputation, and career opportunities. A small ~3% of feedback mentions bureaucracy and less useful online resources.
With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
With an average rating of 3.91/5, ~73% of reviews are positive, praising qualified professors and numerous student activities. Some negative feedback (~18%) mentions outdated equipment and a lack of guidance.
Most reviews ( ~78%) are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, approachable faculty, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~11%) mention communication issues with administration and dissatisfaction with the program.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
