University of Wroclaw - UWr vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs University of Lodz - UL vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 225 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Enriching academic and personal development opportunities
- +Great student city atmosphere and global opportunities
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +High-quality education and excellent, approachable professors.
- +Friendly, multicultural atmosphere and enjoyable student life.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and conducive study environment.
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Passionate and supportive professors
- +Diverse student activities and communities
- +Relevant and practical programs
- +Helpful, knowledgeable professors and opportunities for professional development.
- +Creative, flexible courses and space for self-expression.
- +Modern campus with collaborative study spaces.
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are evident.
- -Course content and program structure are not suitable for all students.
- -Limited career opportunities beyond specific fields are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engaging or up-to-date curriculum is a recurring concern.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support for student tasks is frustrating.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program quality and perceived lack of learning.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Location**, earning a top rating. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a generally positive range.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings, with its **location** and **value** being particularly well-regarded. The **professors** and **internationality** also received high marks. The **student life** achieved a solid rating, while **facilities** and **accommodation** were the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
Performance at this institution is strongest in Location and Student Life, both receiving a high rating of 4.625. Facilities and Internationality are also well-regarded, scoring 4.25 and 4.125 respectively, with Value also at 4.125. The areas with the lowest scores are Accomodation (3.75) and Professors (3.875), indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its internationality, scoring a high 4.17. Location also received a solid 4. Areas for improvement are accommodation, with the lowest rating of 2.6, and facilities and value, both scoring 3.33. Professors and student life are rated moderately well, at 3.83 and 3.5 respectively.
With ~83% of 67 reviews being positive, students praise helpful lecturers, great atmosphere, and academic/personal growth opportunities. A small ~4.5% of negative feedback mentions disappointing course relevance and limited opportunities.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.13/5, reviews highlight a high-quality education, excellent professors, and a supportive, friendly atmosphere. Students also appreciate the modern, well-equipped facilities and the vibrant city life.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising qualified and passionate professors, ample student activities, and a supportive environment. A small portion (~12.5%) of feedback mentions issues with classroom equipment and teaching quality.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, highlighting helpful professors and professional development opportunities. Some feedback (~17%) notes difficulties with communication and administrative processes.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
