Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs UCES vs National University of Mar del Plata vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT vs National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM: wins 4/6 categories
UCES: wins 0/6 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 1/6 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/6 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS: wins 1/6 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: System Engineering
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Professors
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.00
Win
3.67
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.00
3.67
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.50
Win
3.67
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
1.00
3.00
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and well-equipped facilities
  • +Active, student-friendly campus environment
  • +Convenient location
  • +Flexible scheduling and multiple campus locations
  • +Positive overall college experience
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert professors and supportive environment
  • +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and course content.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in several key areas, boasting top scores for its location and strong marks for professors and value. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities are rated moderately.

This university presents a solid profile, excelling particularly in the quality of its professors and its attractive location, both scoring a perfect 4. Student life, internationality, and value are also strong points, all rated at a good 3.67. However, accommodation is identified as a weaker area, receiving a rating of 3, with facilities also trailing slightly behind at 3.33.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 3 reviews are positive, contributing to a 4.67/5 average rating. Recurring themes include excellent professors and a well-equipped, student-friendly campus environment. Parking was a minor issue for one student.

With a 3.25 average rating, most feedback is positive (~74%) highlighting dynamism and flexibility in course scheduling and venue options across multiple locations. No negative feedback was received.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
67%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
33%
25%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close