Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs Rotterdam School of Management - RSM vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 160 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
- +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
- +Diverse community and international opportunities
- +Innovative, problem-solving engineering focus
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Engaging learning, personal development, and strong community
- +Comprehensive and specialized business programs with diverse course offerings.
- +Expert faculty and strong academic support fostering a great learning environment.
- +International atmosphere, networking opportunities, and high-quality education.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Small university feel with engaged professors and students
- +Rigorous liberal arts academic program
- +Opportunity to make a community impact
- +Practical, real-world focus
- +International and diverse community
- +Supportive, close-knit environment
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course content fails to meet student needs.
- -Lack of personal interaction with professors and feeling like a number.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring concern.
- -The course content and teaching methods are perceived as uninspiring.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction diminishes academic value.
This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.
This institution garners strong approval for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Professors and internationality also receive positive marks, exceeding 4.2. Student life ratings are solid at nearly 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation, with a score of 3.5, and value, which is rated at 4.35.
This institution exhibits a very strong overall profile, with exceptional ratings in **Internationality (5.0)** and **Location (4.71)**. **Facilities** also score highly at **4.67**. The **Accommodation** category, while still positive, shows the lowest score at **4.0**. Other areas like Student Life and Value are well-received, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly in **location, student life, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly regarded, earning another 5. The primary area for improvement lies in its **facilities**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Accommodation also scores well at 4.
This institution receives outstanding marks across most aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value are all rated at a near-perfect 4.67. Internationality stands out as a perfect 5. Accommodations, while still strong, are the lowest rated category at 4.33, representing the sole area for potential improvement.
~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.35/5, students praise the university's focus on engineering, innovation, and real-world problem-solving. They highlight engaging courses, dedicated lecturers, and a supportive academic environment.
Around 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting interesting courses, good organization, and professional faculty. A small portion of feedback (about 9%) mentions large class sizes and limited professor interaction.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Based on one review, the university is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights small class sizes, professor-student engagement, and a dynamic academic environment. No negative reviews were provided.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight practical, real-world project experience and an international environment. The program is seen as future-focused and impactful.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.
Erasmus university especially RSM is known as one of the best business school in Europe. IBA is a great program for anyone would like to study business. The curriculum cover broad topics in business area with a possibility to choose your specialization. Also there are a lot of opportunities to participate in exchange, internship, or minor in other faculties. I would recommend this program for anyone interested in business study.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When I decided to look into international schools (as an American), I never expected I could find a university like this one. I love the closeness of this small university, the engagement of the professors and students to create dynamic classroom environments, and the feeling that I can make a difference in my community. The academic program is very rigorous and upholds a liberal arts
Nothing to show
