SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Vistula University vs Zabielski Foundation vs VIZJA University

Side-by-side comparison from 204 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR (4.50)
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 4/7 categories
Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR: wins 0/7 categories
Vistula University: wins 1/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Warsaw, Poland
4.00
Read more reviews
125 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
40 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
Not rated
3.87
Not rated
4.13
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.30
Not rated
Professors
4.30
Win
Not rated
4.02
Not rated
4.13
4.10
Not rated
Internationality
4.04
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.10
Not rated
Student life
4.11
Win
Not rated
3.89
Not rated
3.86
3.80
Not rated
Value
4.15
Not rated
3.86
Not rated
3.88
4.30
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.58
Win
Not rated
3.14
Not rated
3.51
3.30
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
  • +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
  • +High-quality teaching and respected professors
  • +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
  • +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Supportive and practical learning experience
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
  • +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
  • +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
  • -Lack of support and usability from online systems
  • -Overbearing control over student organizations
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
  • -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
  • -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.

Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.

With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.

With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.

Nothing to show

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
50%
34%
0%
40%
40%
0%
4★
52%
50%
45%
0%
45%
40%
0%
3★
4%
0%
15%
0%
10%
10%
0%
2★
4%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
3%
0%
5%
10%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

Very good

I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.

Supportive Environment and Practical Learning

Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close