IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs Université de Cergy-Pontoise vs emlyon business school vs Audencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 355 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Rennes School of Business: wins 1/7 categories
Université de Cergy-Pontoise: wins 1/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 1/7 categories
École des Ponts Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MSc in International Management & Business
Best programme: International Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.10
4.25
Win
4.22
3.85
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.29
4.29
2.97
4.66
Win
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Professors
4.28
4.28
3.45
4.12
4.03
4.50
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.55
4.34
3.77
4.63
Win
4.29
4.50
Not rated
Student life
4.25
4.41
Win
3.93
4.30
3.93
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.31
4.17
3.83
4.49
Win
4.16
4.33
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.82
3.48
4.00
Win
3.47
2.83
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Excellent faculty and stimulating academic environment
  • +Strong international student community and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and practical focus
  • +Supportive professors and environment
  • +Engaging and diverse programs
  • +Strong career integration and company links
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
  • +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
  • +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
  • +International focus and diverse programs
  • +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and student community

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues, especially for international students.
  • -Poor English communication and fluency from both administration and some professors.
  • -Lack of inclusivity and accessibility for non-French speakers.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
  • -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

An assessment of the university reveals strong student life and internationality, with ratings of 4.41 and 4.34 respectively. Professors and location also received favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scored 3.82. Overall, facilities and value were rated well, indicating a generally positive experience for students in these aspects.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. Student life also scores well at 3.93, alongside a respectable value rating of 3.83. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 2.97. Professors, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential development.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.

The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~97% of feedback praising excellent faculty, practical learning, and a supportive international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights administrative and communication issues, particularly for international students.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise the supportive environment, quality teaching, and professional integration. Some mention administrative issues, while ~0% expressed strong negative sentiment.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
49%
45%
33%
63%
31%
33%
0%
4★
44%
55%
50%
27%
63%
50%
0%
3★
9%
0%
17%
10%
0%
17%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close