IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Cergy-Pontoise vs emlyon business school vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie

Side-by-side comparison from 334 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Université de Cergy-Pontoise: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MSc in International Management & Business
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: International Business
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.25
4.22
3.85
3.83
3.50
5.00
Win
Location
4.29
2.97
4.66
4.00
3.33
3.67
5.00
Win
Professors
4.28
3.45
4.12
4.03
3.83
4.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.55
3.77
4.63
4.29
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
3.93
4.30
3.93
3.50
4.33
5.00
Win
Value
4.31
3.83
4.49
4.16
3.83
4.33
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.48
4.00
3.47
3.20
2.83
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Supportive professors and environment
  • +Engaging and diverse programs
  • +Strong career integration and company links
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
  • +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
  • +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
  • +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
  • +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
  • +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
  • +International focus and diverse programs
  • +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and student community
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development
Cons
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
  • -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
  • -Poor quality education and value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. Student life also scores well at 3.93, alongside a respectable value rating of 3.83. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 2.97. Professors, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential development.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.

The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise the supportive environment, quality teaching, and professional integration. Some mention administrative issues, while ~0% expressed strong negative sentiment.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.

With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
33%
63%
31%
33%
33%
100%
4★
44%
50%
27%
63%
33%
50%
0%
3★
9%
17%
10%
0%
17%
17%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close