London School of Commerce - LSC vs NEXT Academy vs UCSI University vs Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM vs University of Malaya - UM

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
NEXT Academy: wins 0/5 categories
UCSI University: wins 0/5 categories
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM: wins 0/5 categories
University of Malaya - UM: wins 0/5 categories
Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM: wins 0/5 categories
Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology: wins 5/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Interior Architecture and Design
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4.20
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3.70
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
3.00
4.13
3.90
3.67
5.00
Win
Location
4.75
Not rated
5.00
4.38
4.80
4.50
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.00
4.11
4.20
4.17
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.00
4.00
3.80
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
3.75
Not rated
1.00
3.88
4.50
4.17
5.00
Win
Value
2.75
Not rated
2.50
4.33
4.20
3.83
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
3.60
3.33
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive academic advisors and practical, hands-on learning.
  • +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Strong academic reputation and exceptional faculty
  • +Excellent campus facilities and environment
  • +Industry collaborations and career opportunities
  • +Prestigious global and local reputation
  • +High-quality, practical learning experiences
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities
  • +Supportive and expert faculty with strong industry relevance
  • +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
  • +Valuable internships and vibrant student experience
  • +Career-ready, practical, and industry-focused programmes
  • +Supportive lecturers and valuable real-world project experience
  • +Rewarding holistic student experience
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues plague the administration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained, impacting the learning environment.
  • -Limited access to resources and support services hinders student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
  • -Excessive and inflexible penalties are a significant concern.
  • -Unhelpful and rude staff exacerbate problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment cause significant frustration.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Poor faculty engagement and support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in practical aspects, with perfect scores for both **location** and **accommodation**. However, student life appears to be a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately, while professors are well-regarded. The overall value proposition of the university is a point of concern, indicated by a below-average score in that area.

This university garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **location** (4.375) and **value** (4.333). **Facilities** and **professors** also receive commendable scores around 4.1. Areas for potential improvement include **student life**, which received the lowest rating at 3.875, though **accommodation** and **internationality** both score a solid 4.

A standout performer, the university excels particularly in its **Location** (4.8) and **Student Life** (4.5). **Professors** (4.2) and **Value** (4.2) also receive strong marks. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation** (3.6), which is the lowest-rated category. **Facilities** (3.9) and **Internationality** (3.8) fall within a moderate range.

This institution garners its highest marks in Location, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and Student Life also score very well, indicating satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, with ratings suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Value fall in the middle, reflecting a generally positive but not outstanding performance.

This institution garners exceptional scores across the board, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category. This suggests outstanding performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no discernible weak areas, the university presents a consistently strong offering to its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise the well-structured program and supportive academic advisors. A practical, hands-on approach to learning and a vibrant campus environment are highlighted.

Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research, and supportive faculty. A small percentage (around 11%) of negative feedback criticizes slow administrative processes and unhelpful management.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% highlight the university's prestige, strong global and employer reputation, and diverse multicultural environment. There is minimal negative feedback.

The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting smooth enrollment, well-equipped facilities, and valuable internships. Students praise expert teachers and a vibrant campus life. No negative feedback was reported.

This university garners highly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise practical, industry-focused courses, supportive lecturers, and valuable real-world project experiences that enhance career readiness.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
56%
40%
0%
100%
4★
25%
0%
0%
33%
40%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
20%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

engineering, technology, and research.

In my opinion, UTM is one of the leading universities in Malaysia, especially for engineering and technology-related fields. What I like most is its strong academic reputation, research opportunities, and diverse international community. The university also maintains collaborations with industries, which can benefit students in terms of internships and future careers. One aspect that some students may find challenging is that administrative processes can occasionally be slow, and adapting to a large campus may take time for new students. However, these are relatively minor issues compared to the overall quality of education. Overall, I would recommend UTM to students who are looking for a reputable university with strong academic programs, research exposure, and an international learning environment. If you are applying to UTM yourself, I can also help you write more personalized answers based on your academic background.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close